News and Insights

South Carolina Investment Tax Credit: State Court of Appeals Overrules Department of Revenue Interpretation of Credit Limit

Tax Development Apr 22, 2025

South Carolina Investment Tax Credit: State Court of Appeals Overrules Department of Revenue Interpretation of Credit Limit

The South Carolina Court of Appeals has held that the Investment Tax Credit is an annual credit cap and not a lifetime cap as the Department of Revenue (DOR) interpreted it to be. This case1 follows an audit initially disallowing multimillions in credit for a taxpayer, whereas there is now court clarification overturning that disallowance.

About the Credit 

The South Carolina Investment Tax Credit is a nonrefundable income tax credit with a 10-year carry-forward period. A taxpayer that places qualified manufacturing or productive equipment into service during the tax year, can receive a credit based on how the equipment is depreciated:

  • Three-year property: 0.5% of total cost
  • Five-year property: 1% of total cost
  • Seven-year property: 1.5% of total cost
  • Ten-year property: 2% of total cost
  • Fifteen-year or longer property: 2.5% of total cost

Qualified equipment includes:

  • Equipment used directly in manufacturing, production, extraction, or utilities (e.g., water, electricity, communications) in South Carolina’s economic impact zones
  • Tangible property that qualifies under Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Section 168
  • Considered “Section 1245 property” under IRS rules
  • Either:
    • Built or installed by the taxpayer in South Carolina, or
    • First used by the taxpayer in South Carolina if purchased

Computer software that controls or monitors manufacturing processes qualifies too—if it’s depreciable.

Note: the credit can’t reduce a taxpayer’s income tax by more than 25% in any given year. If you sell or move the equipment out of state before its full depreciation period ends, you must pay back a portion of the credit.

South Carolina Case Reviewing Investment Credit Limit

The central legal question in the Duke Energy Corp case was whether the $5 million limit on investment tax credits in the South Carolina Tax Code § 12-14-60(G) is a lifetime cap or an annual cap.

Background

  • Taxpayer claimed investment tax credits under § 12-14-60(A)(1) for tax years 2011–2014
  • The South Carolina DOR audited taxpayer’s returns (1996–2014) and in 2018 issued a Notice of Adjustment, disallowing $19,850,727 in tax credits, interpreting subsection (G) as a lifetime cap
  • Taxpayer protested, leading to a hearing before the Administrative Law Court (ALC)

ALC’s Finding 

  • The ALC found the statute ambiguous and sided with the DOR, interpreting the $5 million limit as a lifetime cap
  • It also ruled that:
    • The DOR’s change to tax forms did not violate rule-making procedures

South Carolina Court of Appeals Decision on March 26, 2025

 Reversed the ALC’s ruling, holding the statute unambiguously imposes an annual cap, not a lifetime one

  • Key reasons:
    • Subsection (A)(1) states credit applies in “any taxable year”
    • The credit applies against a yearly income tax (§ 12-6-530)
    • Legislative purpose supports ongoing incentives for business growth and equipment investment—not a one-time benefit
    • Subsection (D)(1)’s 10-year carryforward provision supports an annual structure
    • Reading the statute as a whole supports annual application of the limit
    • The DOR’s interpretation contradicts the statute’s plain language, which appellate courts are bound to follow

Generally, courts will defer to the DOR’s interpretation of the law, which here would be the lifetime limit reading by the DOR; however, the Court found their interpretation contradicts the statute’s plain language. Therefore, the court overruled the DOR’s interpretation and held for the taxpayer.

Note: THIS DECISION IS NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

In South Carolina, a party typically has 15 calendar days to file a motion for rehearing after the appellate court issues its decision. This decision was made March 26, 2025.

Why Ryan?

If you have questions about how this legislation or other tax matters will impact your business, reach out to the Ryan contacts listed below. Ryan has industry-leading experts with depth of experience working on South Carolina Credits and Incentives.

1 Duke Energy Corp. v. S.C. Dep’t of Revenue, No. 6107, 2025 S.C. App. LEXIS 25 (Ct. App. March 26, 2025).

TECHNICAL INFORMATION CONTACTS:

Allea Newbold
Principal
Ryan
813.371.0566
allea.newbold@ryan.com

Matt Lowell
Principal
Ryan
321.251.2924
matt.lowell@ryan.com

Savannah Jermance
Director
Ryan
505.312.4411
savannah.jermance@ryan.com

Jay Patel
Senior Manager
Ryan
210.429.8271
jay.patel@ryan.com

Meghan Sproule
Senior Consultant
Ryan
760.885.3287
meghan.sproule@ryan.com

The material presented in this communication is intended to provide general information only and should solely be seen as broad guidance and not directed to the particular facts or circumstances of any individual who may read this publication. No liability is accepted for acts or omissions taken in reliance upon the content of this piece. Before taking (or not taking) any action, readers should seek professional advice specific to their situation from Ryan, LLC or other tax professionals. For additional information about this topic, please contact us at info@ryan.com.